Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Diana van Eyk's avatar

Thanks for connecting these dots. I agree completely with what you've said.

Also, don't forget that war itself consumes huge amounts of fossil fuels with their bombers, tanks, etc. and causes untold environmental damage. And for what? More fossil fuels, of course, and American hegemony.

It's insane.

Expand full comment
Kojo's avatar
Oct 8Edited

Excellent article!

I would add one clarification on Libya. The US created coup there wasn't merely because of the issue of the petrodollar. Gaddafi came to power in a 1969 coup that removed the US's tool King Idris:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idris_of_Libya

This coup and Gaddafi's new government, meant that the US eventually lost access to a naval base they had in Libya. And that they US oil companies could no longer take most of the wealth from Libya's oil production, as it was nationalised and foreign involvement was no longer on outrageously unfavourable terms. Using this wealth, Gaddafi implemented socialist programs and proved in Africa and the Middle East that a different way was possible: universal free education, universal free healthcare, free housing government run social welfare state, not neoliberal capitalism. All paid for directly from the nation's wealth of national resources.

Now you might be thinking that was 1969 and bygones are bygones. But that's not how the ghouls in the US government and spooks think. They carry grudges for EVER. Like Iran since 1979 and Cuba since 1958.

That's why Gaddafi was removed. At various points in time over the decades they had sanctioned Libya and some may recall the Reagan era incident with the jets and so on. They always had it out for him. It wasn't merely the petrodollar thing.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts